Climate Change – Bob Carters 5 Tests of CO2 part 1
Monday, February 8th, 2010 at
8:20 pm
Professor Bob Carter makes an examination of whether Climate change is due to CO2 emissions with 5 straight forward tests a must see video
Tagged with: Carters • CHANGE • CLIMATE • Climate Change • Co2 Emissions • Part • Professor Bob Carter • Tests
Filed under: Information
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
@goog2k
@Nightversionn
global warmists
like paidTROLLgoog2kOILNightversionn
accuse others of conspiring to make money
all the while hiding their ties to BIG OIL
WHOA
In just FIVE YEARS between 2004-2009 the thickness of arctic ice has DROPPED 42%.
This was discovered by NASA satellite measurements. Reported 7/7/09
Search:
New NASA Satellite Survey Reveals Dramatic Arctic Sea Ice Thinning
Global Warming is changing our world NOW. CO2 is 35% above levels for 650,000 years. In just 30 years CO2 will be over 450ppm, enough to acidify oceans to the point of stopping the growth of many planktons and corals. They are at the base of the oceans’ food chain.
Duh??
9 of last 10 years were the HOTTEST on record.
2009 = 2nd HOTTEST on record
& solar irradiance is at 35 year low
Search: Data @ NASA GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Graphs
See: Ranking (Top 10 Warmest Years)
The latest on YouTube:
It’s so Cold, there can’t be Global Warming
/watch?v=sAvqabAPIr4&feature=sub
50% of arctic sea ice & mountain glaciers have disappeared in just 30 years.
Plants, animals & insects are all migrating north
Search: Climate Change: NASA’s Eyes on the Earth
Are you saying cigarettes are not bad for me or that human carbon emissions are just as bad as smoking cigarettes? My guess is you’re trying to say the former but are actually saying the latter. Also, if your reaction to the assertion that humans are damaging the environment is to ask the question “shut the f*** up”, then I can see how hard you’re trying to cover your eyes to the whole issue. If you’re a representation of the opposition, then we’ve got a lot backwards ignorant rednecks left.
Look on a pack of cigarettes.”Cigarette smoke contains Carbon ‘Monoxide’.”Let me ask you this,’Shut the fuck up!!!Haha!! Does the word ,”Shut the fuck up”,mean anything to you! LOL! Now run along and don’t forget to Shut the fuck up!!!!!!!
patpilotglider: I’m afraid that almost everything you say is myth. I’m sure you are sincere in your list but you have clearly been brainwashed. I don’t have any vested interest either way. I just want some truthful science, but nearly everything on your list is simply not true, or unsubstantiated. PLEASE do some research away from the conventional media so you gain a more balanced view. Thank you.
And because the cost of Flying and driving was so expensivefrom the taces on Gas and Jet fuel people did travel less and theus the Airline Layoffs making the people unable to pay their mortgage, buy food,buy Consumer goods
And because people spend less or nothing when they are unemployed Stores like Walmart ,Sears,and others that sell consumer goods loose business and Layoff meaning more people taht can’t pay their mortgage, buy food,buy consumer goods,travel
The power to tax is to destroy
Don’t have the patientce to Spellheck or proofread.
It’s not iIncreaing Txes some dumbasses think will discorage less flying and car ussage that’s the problem…it’s that it was done before and what was caused the Global Economic BUbble to burst in the first place and now they want to do it again that’s the stupidity
People like to blame the Mortgage Dirivatives, but if people wasn’t paying so much for gas to get to work and food to live on they would have paid their mortgafge
Do you even proof read what you’re typing archangel, or just guess at the keys and leave it at that?
The oil companies don’t care about carbon taxes as they’ll just pass the extra costs back onto the consumers – YOU!
The Copenhagen Treaty and the AGW scare tactics are just an excuse to form a global government to remove your sovereignty and basic rights. This is not about big oil but the politics of global control of resources, mostly money funnelled to the poor countries.
Pfft,
Al Gore is linked to oil…so is the Economist that heads the IPCC
IN fact “Big Oil”,the Saudis,OPEC,and anyone involved wit oil/energy is at the Copenhegan meeting
Like Dell Chemical played both sides of the Freon Debate as the Freon patent was to expire and they had a new procucr lined up, so to is “Big Oil” (Exxon,GE,Shell,BPChevton) playing both sides and running the AGW and Peak Oil scare while offering their Nuclear,Biofuels,Geothermal,Soalr,wind,,wave kinetic tech…lol
P.S. using satilite imaging on remote Ice Sheets can show “retreat”,yees, but has a hard tine showing depth and vertical reach (as in rebuilt Ice can stack vertically instead of spread outwars)
Really can’t tell unless your Armchair “climate Experts” in their cushy offices at Universities [playing with Glorified SimEarth programs and looking at outdate satilite images form older generatio nsatilite images with not spectrometots ad radar depth gauging get their asses out on the ice and dig
Dead Winter has Arrived in Copenhagen less then a week to the offical start of Winter Dec 21 with a Blizzard putting 4 inches of snow on the ground as Delegates try to fleece the United State with what is best descride as a International Energy develoment Welfare Program where they want 1.2 trillion dollars in entitlements from the U.S. but the bitches are moaning as Hillary for Obama is saying more like 100 billion
In dead winter the Ice Shelfs and Polar Ice rebuild, in Summer it melts..duh
If you think the current warming is natural you are in cloud cuckoo land.
How about the following:-
Ice at both poles is decreasing
93% all glaciers are in retreat
Ice shelves are breaking up
Spring in all parts of the world arriving earlier
Permafrost is melting in the high latitudes
The rate of sea level rise is increasing
Surface sea temperatures are rising
its obvbious oily propaganda, just research the facts you fools
Maybe the real propaganda is that Bob receives funding from oil companies – but really doesn’t? Anyone can create a rubbish review and dump it on the web.
Bob Carter’s and Lord Christopher Monckton’s science makes perfect sense without even having to compare it to the fudged figures of the IPCC.
hehe like a prophet, wellsighted!
This is a personal attack. Can’t you focus on the question at hand? Or are you merely intent upon causing damage to the image and reputation of all that believe differently to yourself? Do you have any of your own thoughts?
Traits of the ignorant and reactionary:
lack of respect for others, accusatory, paranoia, inflexible, inability to focus on specifics of an argument, fearful.
Traits of the open-minded:
willingness to listen to and consider opposing views, respectful, resilient, flexible, happy.
wow “cased closed” are you serious! spoken like a true BELIEVER, if you don’t like bob why not listen to the hundreds of other scientists or are they all corrupted by oil company’s? your a complete ignoramus. No one should believe in ether side of the argument look at the evidence listen to experts like Willem de Lange, a New Zealand oceanographer and climate scientist who I know has more integrity in his little finger than the entire IPCC. DO NOT BELIEVE RESEARCH FOR YOURSELF
Where are they?
The same place where you keep your logical thinking skills. Your “red herring” tactics do nothing to discredit Bob Carter’s arguments.
@nlpjohn
what happened to your nlp skills?
oh man..
Of course the real scientist are paid by evil taxes. (not much im shure..!)
Of course mr.lobby-bobby get paid privately by big OIL-corporations (very much im shure…!) They need lobbypeople for exactly tendentious lobby-jobs we can see HERE in this video obviously.
please do you OWN research
instead of believing a well known OIL-lobbyist like lobby-bobby in the junkscience jam here. Please!
And Sorry, but much more YOUR objection shows what a incredible naive person you are.
Make up his mind? You need to improve your reading comprehension. He was very clear there has been very SLIGHT warming from 1970-98 and from 98- onward it has flatlined/cooled Perhaps you didn’t understand him because English is not your first language…
Paid? And warming alarmist are paid by politicians via tax payer money. This might be a surprise to you but most people work for money… Your reply screams ignorance. You possess neither the knowledge or nor the williness to understand both sides of an argument. Your reply shows you are a lazy and dull witted…
-case closed-